mewcomm

Going to cover a riot? Man UP!

“Civil Disobedience”, a  “riot”, an “unruly mob”, “hooligans”……….all music to a news photographer’s eyes and ears.  The chaos, unpredictability, the pathos, of angry, emotional crowds of people. And Yes, the DANGER!  These environments are among the most exciting to capture moments of anarchy, humanity, cruelty and even amusement.

Watching the scenes in Egypt today, I found myself flashing back on what I would do were I to join the photographic fray. A partial primer.

What would I take in addition to my camera package?  A waist pack, with a Flashlight (LED), Soft Gloves, clean rags or hankies, water bottles (as many as you can easily carry), a cap and clear eye protection a hand held radio with pre loaded law enforcement and public safety frequencies (analog and digital), maps (no not your iPhone map) a paper blow up of the 25/50 square blocks around the area of the event (laminated in plastic), a hard hat (optional) and any must have prescribed medications. ( You may plan 3 hours at the Demo and end up in Jail for 3 days. Take your meds! And throw in a bottle of asprin too! Do I really even need to mention food?)

 Dress in sturdy pants (no shorts) long sleeves, socks and light weight ankle high shoes (Merrells ). And dress for the climate.

Important Option:  A gas mask. If you have no training or experience in the use of Gas protection, and you have the time (and money) then do it. Train with CS gas, and expose yourself to it under accepted training practices.  There are many videos for gas training. Do your homework and buy/rent/ or borrow the gear, otherwise, go it the old fashion way. Take your chances.

Press Pass (what’s that you say, you’re a “Citizen Journalist”? NO “real” press pass?) Be imaginative go to Google Images search PRESS Pass take a template and make your own, laminate it and go forth) Hell even Flickr has a “Press Pass”.  Everyone is a journalist! (I say that derisively!)  Now, don’t get carried away. Make it clean and professional in appearance and do not misrepresent yourself.  Often an official appearing badge will get you cleared into restricted areas that otherwise you’d be denied.

Covering a potentially violent demo is all about judgment. And luck!  Want to stand on the top of that  garbage truck for a better view of Police busting heads in the park nearby? Go ahead and if the truck takes off and you break your leg you knew the risk. Still, taking chances can yield visual dividends. Dare smartly!

Think and act responsibly. It doesn’t take a social psychologist to read a crowd’s mood. And an otherwise restrained group can turn into a hostile mob in a few seconds. Remain Situationally AWARE! Watch your surroundings. Do NOT “pal around with demonstrators”. They are NOT your friends. You are there to cover the event.  No matter your politics you’ll be better served by remaining neutral in your actions.  No “high fives” or “glad handing” with participants. The “perception” of favoritism or editorial bias is easy to misconstrue. Be careful!  Likewise you are not there to “be friends with the Police” (way too many young reporters these days, think of themselves as allies of the Police. ) Further, hostile elements in a crowd of demonstrators may well interpret your behavior as being sympathetic or supportive of the “state”.  Do as law enforcement instructs, say “Yes, Sir” “No, maam” and then move on and find a way around them and get back to covering the chaos of the event.
 
DON’T run from Tear gas! Relax. Check which way the wind is blowing. (And are the police advancing on your position?!) CS gas won’t kill you. Yes, it burns, yes it’s uncomfortable. Yes it may make you sick and give you a maximum headache. So what? You didn’t come to this event to feel good. You came to cover it. Man up!  Practice with gas before hand, just as military and law enforcement do. Learn to quickly put on your gas mask and properly clear and fit it.  NO gas mask? Cover your face, mouth, nose and eyes as best you can. Then pour clean water into your eyes and NEVER touch your eyes/face with your hands!  Then reload, check your batteries and media and move out!  Find the story!  Keep moving!

TIP: Watch the Police Tactical Commander on the Street. They are  key.  Locate their Command post. Often "detainees" are held in a temporary staging area. Find it. If  possible get the tactical radio frequency of all Public safety and law enforcement to monitor their actions. ( this is highly unlikely anymore as many cities have moved their radios to Digitally encrypted transmission systems.)  Still it’s worth the look.

Each demonstration is different. Go to many. The vast majority are not violent. (thus less adrenaline). But you’ll learn with each event and one hopes get better at “covering” this kind of visual opportunity. There are many additional methods and means of planning to cover a demo. What is the route?: Have you done a recon?  Where are buildings you can get access to for high shots? Do a multi-team Shoot with Radio communications between photographers. (Don't count on the Net or Cell service being up.)  Anyway Go forth!  Have a blast! 

Disclaimer: Use this information at your own risk.

The author covered many demonstrations (some violent/most not) in Washington DC and elsewhere as a (20 year)  television news cameraman.

When Short Wave Listening Still Mattered

On April 18/19 of 1995, there were two significant events in world history.  One was the machete slaughter of some 2000 (mostly women and children) in the Kibeho refugee camp of Rwanda. Only 24 hours later the bombing  of a U.S. government building killing 300+ civilians in Oklahoma City by a single person.

 
Most Americans main source of news in the US was and remains television. (at least for now) And during that spring week in 1995, the American Networks broadcast near non-stop Oklahoma stories about the 300+ persons that were murdered by an armed militia sympathizer, Timothy McVeigh.  Little else was mentioned on the still dominant evening news casts of the big three.

Like many Hams, at heart I'm an SWL.  It is where most of us were introduced to the "magic" of radio.  And also like many hams, I have a bedside short wave radio that I listen to a couple of times a week. And so it was, by late in the week during that spring of 95, I tuned across the BBC's World News Feed for the 8:00pm broadcast.  And there for the first 20 minutes of the program, I was exposed to the world beyond the parochial interests of the American news organizations. There I learned for the first time of the brutal murders that spawned a week of chaos and blood thirsty killing throughout Rwanda.  The scale of the deaths in Rwanda paled the Oklahoma  City event.  And the fresh BBC reporting was mesmerizing when compared to the insular American coverage by commercial networks.

Now recall that Marc Andresson's Netscape Navigator was only in Version 1.22 by the spring of 1995. The Web was still in it's infancy. Internet connected mobile devices were some years away.  Even TV news still mattered.  And so did Short Wave Radio broadcasts. 

As the wireless-net connected world nears ubiquity, and despite the reduced number of short wave broadcasts, to me, Short Wave Listening still matters.  Enjoy it while you can.

In the 'analog era' they called it theft.

Cruising Google news, I stumble upon a Gizmodo  blurb with a direct rip off of a celebrated Winston Churchill quote in the first sentence. The practice of plagiarism is wide spread though efforts are being made daily to discredit the "permission" culture.  Proponents of the "remix"of content and "mashups'  use intellectual "pretzel logic" (thank you Steely Dan) to justify their actions.    Google's Open Source Program manager  claims such sharing ("stealing"?)  will "make the world a better place for us all" [Sometimes these Net utopians make  me gag] The intellectual rationale for this is led by distinguished Stanford Law Professor Larry Lessig who founded the 'Creative Commons" legal framework to justify the taking of other people's ideas. "Lessig presents this as a desirable ideal and argues, among other things, that the health, progress, and wealth creation of a culture is fundamentally tied to this participatory remix process". And others have pushed this concept to absurd feel good lengths. 

I won't engage these zealots. But I don't think even Professor Lessig would accept a direct rip-off quote from one of the most important historical figures of the 20th century. Would he?

 

 

Non Profit Journalism? Maybe, but it's hard to see.

Can "non profit" models of journalism be effective?  This concept is being offered up to fill the void of newspapers that are laying off investigative reporters "left and right". I'm doubtful.

Blogger and media observer Jaclyn Schiff asks,  "What are the limitations" of non profit journalism (serious journalism that is)?

In an online editorial  Charles Lewis & Bruce Sievers   "All the News that's fit to Finance" accurately describe the dire straits ad supported journalism faces.   The business is imploding faster than most of us could have imagined.  The Non-Profit model as called for by various news thinkers is a good option.  But here's where I'm skeptical.

One of the greatest investigative journalism stories of my generation (I'm not talking about  Watergate!  :) ) was the Pentagon Papers crisis. An event Jaclyn surely studied as a student at GWU!  The story was broken by Neil Sheehan of the NY Times and subsequent releases by Daniel Schorr of CBS news. It caused a "Firestorm" in Washington. It was a domestic crisis of enormous magnitude over the Vietnam war  involving the White House, DoD and the Justice department and the press itself. And it challenged the very rationale of a free press and it's role in our nation.

I remember watching Schorr ( I had to go to the library for the NY Times in those days) on TV reporting  the story in the summer of 1971 as a just home from Vietnam student at the University of Texas. It was stunning to watch and read.  In  that analog era, to hear the story reported by Daniel Schorr of CBS news gave it a powerful thrust! This wasn't just anyone it was CBS News and the NY Times!   

So why couldn't a Non-Profit vehicle report such a story now?  They could.  But without the institutional infrastructure of the "Grey Lady" or the huge impact of being one of only three TV networks I believe the story would have far less impact.  With respect to Naomi Klein (Branding matters!).  I knew even then that the NY Times was staffed with serious journalists and a commitment to the highest ethical standards. And moreover they would risk jail to publish such a story!

Could a non-profit news vehicle develop a reputation of journalism excellence? Maybe. And with a wide following?  Unknown.  I think that niche/non-profit reporting while valid will struggle to be heard above the high velocity cacophony of information out there. And the last issue: "Is serious journalism even valued any longer?" Valued enough for citizens to voluntarily pay for it?  I think we know the answer.

I don't know how this plays out. (Like you I'm watching!).  But there is a supreme irony in that we now have more information choices than ever and we're wondering whether the nation is better served. 

Neil Sheehan went on to write "A Bright and Shinning Lie" about Vietnam (and for which he won a Pulitzer prize).  It was a mesmerizing read from a world class reporter. Will we have "world class" reporters anymore? Can they "break out" and be heard? And recognized for their work? Or will they drown in the torrent of words, images and sounds that flood into our lives each day?

I'm not 'cool' enough for Facebook.

I joined Facebook today. My son said I was "late to the party". I dutifully looked around. Even checked out some acquaintances and former colleagues. What I saw just isn't for me.

Observer of Digital culture, Andrew Keen has written extensively about  the Narcissism of the all connected  era.  Facebook  is certainly a place for that. Yet Facebook is not pretentious.  It's a "SOCIAL" network. Good for them!  And clearly they do what they do very well.

No doubt many people find useful engagement on the platform.  But Facebook is not my cup of tea .

Analog Photographer in the Digital Era

If you're a student of photojournalism or a member of the Washington DC press Corps in the 70's and 80's you will  recognize Pulitzer Prize winning photographer David Hume Kennerly . Kennerly is often referred to as a "Political Photographer" after his many years in Washington.  Other American Political Photographers include PF Bentley, Dirck Halstead Wally McNamee, and Diana Walker.  These were huge visual journalists in the Pre-Digital era.  A photo by one of these photographers on the  cover of Time, Life or Newsweek could shape events in a way 1000 images cannot in the visually flooded world of the Internet.  There will not be another group like them. And I was lucky enough to have met all in the group.

Today as I walked through the media compound at the Michael Jackson Memorial service I was surprised to see  a prominent "analog' photographer from the Pre-Digital Era  shooting  images with his CELL PHONE!!!  I pulled up my camera and squeezed off the image below.

Photographically it's not much. But there's much symbolism in the image. Think about it. I did!